Performance testing to improve your greens

admin_ccs

July 16, 2018

Comments Off on Performance testing to improve your greens

PERFORMANCE TESTING TO IMPROVE YOUR GREENS

Creating or bringing the perfect golf green to their optimum condition is the ambition of most golf course managers throughout the country. What defines the perfect golf green though? There are a number of motives, be they positive or negative which impact this topic. Having true, smooth, fast and firm greens sounds ideal, however, one must look at budgets, staffing resources, effects of environmental conditions, membership age, pace of play and overall enjoyment. These are but a few of the factors for turf managers to consider and to make decisions on. Turf managers are faced with tremendous pressures with increasing standards in the industry and also exposure of major golf competitions on television. Major golf competitions generally have playing surfaces which are at their peak condition, and this can give false pretences to golfers as it is unsustainable and uneconomical to maintain those standards year round.

Assessing green speeds, firmness, trueness & smoothness, moisture content and also organic matter are many of the interpretations in which are measured against industry recommended benchmarks.  From these findings, one can identify areas to improve and make recommendations for continual improvements across the putting surfaces.

Carr Golf’s Regional Superintendents perform regular site visits to each venue to ensure that standards are continually met throughout the year.

Carr Golf makes sure that we:

  • Deliver quality playing surfaces that meet the standard demanded for its membership.
  • Work with the club, greenkeeping team and the Greens committee to ensure that the course is in optimum condition.
  • Provide objective data to inform the decision making in the build-up to and during club events.
  • Produce an authentic and realistic challenge and test for our golfers.
  • Provide a course that can adapt to changes and extremes of weather.
  • Ensure the ecological impact is kept to a minimum on the course.

Visits, incorporate the Carr Golf Maintenance Programme where performance measurements are taken and recorded to establish the current state of the course. The results form the basis for the development of a structured and targeted maintenance plan.

Firmness

Greens firmness is measured using, a clegg impact hammer. It calculates how firm the greens are. The 2.25kg hammer is raised to a height of 18 inches operating within a vertical guide tube and dropped. Once dropped this reading measures the speed of deceleration upon impact of the greens surface. The measurement unit is determined in gravities (g). Aiming for between 80 – 130 gravities.

Moisture

Soil moisture meters are used to measure the percentage of volumetric water present in the soil. Depending on the desired surface or rooting depths, probes can be used at different depths to indicate separate moisture readings. Aiming for 15 – 30% moisture.

Smoothness & Trueness

Ball roll characteristics of putting surfaces is critical. The roll of a ball should be smooth and true and not negatively influenced by the immediate turf surface. The Trueness Meter accurately measures the smoothness and trueness of golf greens with the technology able to track the vertical and lateral movements of golf balls across the surface of the course. This enables us to measure surface quality and quantify improvements on the greens. Smoothness is a measure of vertical deflection or “bobble”, whereas trueness is a measure of lateral deflection or “snake.” 

Green Speed

Green speeds are measured using a stimpmeter, and they measure by the influence in which a ball will roll on a flat surface. The stimpmeter is raised to an angle of 20 degrees and 3 golf balls are released individually. A marker is placed where the ball is released from the stimpmeter, and another marker placed where the ball comes to a complete stop. It is the average distance the balls roll, measured in feet. This process should be completed in the opposite direction and the overall average is used to indicate the speed of greens.
A digital slope scale is also very beneficial when selecting a stimp location. As described a flat area must be used, this cannot be determined from the human eye accurately and it is advised to use a digital slope scale. One can all get hung up on green speeds; a good green doesn’t need to be super-fast to be great. If all the measurements above are in target range, then there shouldn’t be any problem at achieving a nice putting surface.

Organic Matter

Samples are first sent off from the desired surface for laboratory testing. Tests can measure organic matter at different depths generally from 0-10cm (0-100mm). Loss on Ignition (LOI) analysis is used to determine the organic matter content (%OM) of a soil sample. LOI calculates the percentage of organic matter by comparing the weight of a sample before and after the soil has been ignited. Before ignition the sample contains organic matter, but after ignition all that remains is the mineral portion of the soil. The difference in weight before and after ignition represents the amount of the organic matter that was present in the sample.

Organic matter is a natural component of all soils and rootzones but it is important that its presence in upper layers is not excessive. If there is too much it can lead to moisture retention and surface softness. Furthermore certain grass types, particularly annual meadow grass (Poa annua), produce a particularly water retentive type of material, rich in cellulose, of which there does not need to be excessive amounts for organic matter to cause problems. In contrast the finer grasses tend to produce a woodier type of organic matter which is nowhere near as water retentive. Therefore greens with a high content of finer grasses can tolerate higher organic matter levels without softness becoming a problem.

Conclusions:

  1. All of Carr Golfs clients who have participated in the Annual Maintenance Programme have made progress over their period of involvement. Those who have participated the longest have seen the greatest relative improvements in the performance of their greens.
  2. Average smoothness and average trueness indicate that golf greens are far from where they should be in terms of the quality of roll they offer. Links greens, which tend to have higher proportions of fine grasses, tend to perform better than parkland in both categories being on average 20% better.
  3. Green speed averaged out at 9ft 6in across all course types over the year test period. Average green speeds have increased over the last ten years, which is positive, but there is still room for further improvement. We must be careful not to focus on this characteristic alone, but there is a need for average green speeds to improve further if the game is to become more enjoyable. This is particularly important on parkland courses.
  4. Greens that show average volumetric moisture content (VMC) values below 30% tend to show higher proportions of fine grasses. Conversely greens with VMC values regularly above this threshold tend to show higher proportions of Poa annua. Thus wetter soils and factors that promote wetness may tend to favour Poa annua.
  5. Organic matter levels in rootzones beneath greens which are too high can also be the cause of poor performance in the firmness data. 10% of parkland courses and 15% of links courses meet the 0-20mm Carr depth target, with levels generally having crept downward since the collection of data.

In Summary

The Carr Programme, which records and collects data and benchmarks for golf greens, has been extremely valuable and as it continues over the next few years will yield further interesting information and no doubt show further progress for those involved. However there is no hiding the fact that the data as a whole shows a need for further improvement. We must improve in all surface performance categories, but particularly in the areas of organic matter management and firmness. How this is achieved is the key question, but our belief is that performance measuring in a regular, structured manner should help protect greenkeepers, and their courses, and provide the evidence to allow them to do their jobs unimpeded by short term agendas.

 

Author: Keith Murray – Head Greenkeeper at Hollystown Golf Club